(2006), Genetic Testing: Care, Consent and Liability, Wilrey-liss ISBN -13:978-047 71649878, 164-178.
Edition ISBN-13: 978-0198238782,58-68.
Cancer is one of the number one killer diseases.
Scientist are making new discoveries every day in the field of genetics that could possibly change our whole world as we know it. They are subjected towards developing cancer. All rights reserved. Argumentative Essay on Genetic Testing All Categories Africa America American History Ancient Art Asia Biographies Book Reports Business Creative Writing Dance Economics English Europe History Humanities Literature Medicine Middle East Miscellaneous Music and Movies Philosophy Poetry & Poets Psychology Religion Science Shakespeare Social Issues Speeches Sports Technology TV United … Would you like to get a custom essay? This is a similar case of a compulsory genetic testing and any case of a genetic related disease being referred to the relevant physicians for appropriate action towards its control and treatment.
Genetic Testing Introduction Genetic testing is a DNA (Deoxyribonucleic acid) based tests. This has some negative consequences as regards the privacy and confidentiality of the genetic testing, information of individuals.
The information on genetic testing should therefore be confidential and its handling should be highly considered to safeguard the owner and the family at large. The rest was history after his eyes opening experiments on pea plants. From the health care point of view reasons for genetic testing exist (Parents & Asch 2000). The principle of Beneficence: The benefits of the society at large are further compounded by the principle of beneficence.
Genetic testing and screening could impact the life all patients in a positive way, therefore the opposing side should be grateful, and take advantage of this opportunities provided. When the news is presented in the delivery room.
Results of genetic testing if positive, ends the gabbling since the insurer cannot gamble against the obvious. Genetic testing first started in 1866 by a scientist known as, Gregor Mendel, when he published his work on pea plants. General information on the Human Genome Project The affected individual may modify their behaviour to make use of the environmental component of the human being make up. In genetic testing egalitarian ethics should have its application in a sense that the decision to take a genetic test should not have the influence of any other member of the community. To strike a balance between the two a conscious understanding of the danger posed by these diseases needs to be made clear. is the sole unit in the living things that stores important information necessary to construct components such as RNA molecules, enzymes and proteins (Buchanan, Brock, Daniel, & Wilkler, 2001). Genetics Teeth. Other areas of dilemma include the insurers. The principle of Justice and rights: This principle tends to assume a neutral perspective of decision-making. Edition ISBN- 13-978-0521669771, 213-231.
This report focused on some of these issues. These tests that look into the essence of humanity, will allow scientist and physicians the opportunity and ability to alter the human genotype for better or worse. In some cases, prenatal genetic testing can lead to timely medical intervention to mitigate or eliminate disease such as with congenital adrenal hyperplasia or a-thalassemia. The government policies are intended to be beneficial to all citizens.
The healthiest approach to problem solution is creation of awareness on causes, effects and results of the problem for the appropriate steps involved to gain effectiveness. The public should receive the maximum benefits out of an action of an individual and therefore the decision to take a genetic test according to this principle should be dictated by the project benefits to the public. 1724 Words 7 Pages. Genetics testing is used in many different situations in today’s society. The skills, expertise knowledge and training relevant to treat these diseases is the ultimate qualifying factor for the position There is an expected balance by the society of the good of the entire public and the good of an individual member of the public.
Im a hundred percent sure that the opposing side has very strong arguments towards genetics testing, and one of the main ones is "playing God."
The newborn baby may also be subjected to a genetic test for the same reasons as applies to the fetus or embryo above. No insurance company will cover young Jacob because, The Ethics of Genetic Testing Impartiality Advocacy and Genetic Testing
In 2001 The Human Genome Project was completed giving us the make up of the entire human genome. The middle ages expressed some form of witch-hunts to victims of communicable diseases. This is a technology of the new millennium and it is bound to have serious repercussions on the fields of information “confidentiality, insurability and employability” (Post & Whitehouse, 1998,102), of the target individual revealed to be a potential danger to the public out of results of genetic testing. Neil F. Sharpe, Ronald F. Carter. Genetic testing Legal Issues: Accountability and Responsibility: –
Insurance companies are gamblers of the first degree. Out of this principle each individual member in the society is liable to make a personal decision as regards the issue of genetic testing. Before, Genetic testing has become very popular as technology has improved, and has opened many doors in the scientific community. The Goal of the Human Genome Project is to obtain genetic mapping information and to determine the complete sequence of all human DNA by the year of 2005.
My point is that the same thing goes to those parent who want to get a update of their unborn child 's health.
“Not only should use of genetic information be allowed in this case, it should be required” (In this case however, Levin fails to consider the chance that the tests are not completely accurate and even if they are, there is still a chance that this person will never have a seizure. Who was involved
2 pages, 815 words. The decision for or against genetic testing therefore lies explicitly on the individual person supposed to take the test (Sumner 1999). It is considered when someone wants to identify health risks, allowing the doctor to make recommendations to their health and decrease their chance in developing the certain disease, or to test to see if the person has other genetic conditions, which would impact their chance of passing on or developing…. Employment and insurance of the positively tested person is put at peril. One of the advantages that genetic testing provides is that the parents could now be informed of the situation, and keep track of their unborn child 's health.
However, genetic screening poses problems that are not and can not be easily overlooked. In an article titled “A Defense of Genetic Discrimination” published in 2013, Noah Levin attempts to defend genetic discrimination and uses the hypothetical example of a bus driver who is asymptomatic, meaning they show no symptoms, but “has a 90 percent chance of suffering a serious epileptic seizure within the next four years” (Genetic discrimination in employment). Although these principles are sound and logical a conclusive solution can never be derived from any one or all of them as a break through of the dilemma of genetic testing. Introduction The explanation does not necessarily fall on morality but rather on logical attempts to formulate a set of rules towards the conducts expected out of a distinct category of human action (Sharpe, & Carter 2006).
Today, most students learn about DNA in middle school biology.
The theory challenges the scientists and professionals with obligations that they should withhold in order that they are objective, unbiased and even honest in their practice when using the deemed appropriate methods (Sharpe, & Carter 2006). These cases are of life and death making the society to assign to the physician immense importance who is taken to possess some substantial jurisdiction over life and death. Show More. This is based on the fact that technology is advancing and scientists’ researches are yielding more and more knowledge especially in the field of health as it relates to genetic variation. This involves a philosophical analysis of moral issues and the efforts to differentiate between what is right and what is wrong.
Fix vs. Abort Genetic screening techniques are coming of age and the controversy that surrounds them is growing by the minute.
Not covering unborn with unwanted traits
It plays an important role in our life. Egalitarian Ethics The tensions experienced as regards genetic testing are out of the conflict between the rights of the individual relative to the rights of the community.
Its sophistication adds to its reliability as techniques of vital use to detect and test genetic disorders.
Such individuals who are unaffected by that particular disease may require a genetic testing to come up with a conclusive result of their carrier position (Sumner, 1999). However, like any other scientific discovery, it bought conflicts which caused major controversies and a large population disagreed with the concept of playing with the genetic codes of human beings.
For some, the information may be a sigh of relief, for others a tear of terror, Genetic Screening Will not Put Limits on Equal Opportunity
Time of discussion leading up to implementation The opponent is in a potentially equal but opposite distinctively opposite position, Principles of Bioethics This is done for the interest of the general public and at the expense of the ethical moral status of the affected person. Genetic testing is also useful in “forensic and identity testing” (Sharpe, & Carter 2006, 89).
and start eating unhealthy foods that could likely speed up their changes of developing a heart disease. What can genetic screening offer people that currently is not being offered and at what, Genetic Screening Mutation issues of these genes further complicate the scenario since the already accounted figures are bound to hike in instances of mutation.
The public health has to deal with a situation whereby an individual is found to have a communicable disease, looking at the two perspectives of the individual and the public. The situation as well poses an equal dilemma to a potential employer. There is a very high likelihood that this technology will be a core part and a routine in all health care fields, which will be compulsory to all irrespective of the genetic position of presence or absence of genetically inherited diseases. The results of the tests project the future health status of the individual and in an instance where critical illness or even death is foreseen, serious implications on family life and socio-economic life are felt by the individual and the family of the individual.