What is Wrong with the Wolseong-1 Reactor? They do have certain rules of engagement. Attack on US Embassy was an act of war by Iran; Democrats (and celebs) disagree with Trump's retaliation On last night's episode of The Ezra Levant Show , we looked at the reaction to Trump's kept promise to retaliate against Iran for their attack on the US Embassy in Baghdad. As for the marines defending an embassy.
An attack on a military post or an attack on a military unit are not acts of terrorism, but are acts of war.
Russia is necessarily proceeding with caution and circumspection but it is faced with antagonists who are set on forcing her to the wall and who are experts at provocation, subterfuge, chaos and killing. Have they forgotten about 2000 or was it different ?
It is not a matter of these countries “enjoying influence” as the Foreign Ministry stated but a matter of their direct support and control of the forces that attacked the consulate. Get your answers by asking now. Christopher Black is an international criminal lawyer based in Toronto, he is a member of the Law Society of Upper Canada and he is known for a number of high-profile cases involving human rights and war crimes, especially for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”. No. The Russian government’s attempt to diminish the responsibility of the United States and its puppets is perhaps understandable in view of the greater objective, which is to avoid a direct conflict with the hegemonic power, but it is impossible to cover over the fact that this was a direct act of aggression against Russia just a few days after the Victory Parade in Moscow that was boycotted by NATO leaders and just after the American foreign secretary John Kerry met with President Putin in Sochi. It was time for something different. The Jimmy Carter example above is dead on! Why did democratic voters reelect Ted Wheeler? Basically, if China wants to go to war with the U.S., they might use this as a reason (but they will find another reason if this doesn't happen), and if China doesn't want to go to war with the U.S., then they will call the U.S.
Technically it is. Of course, the host nation won't consider any violence on their part acceptable, but that's just too bad. But there is no mechanism by which the state criminals behind these actions can be brought to justice. But US marines, if ever faced with that situation, would hold the perimeter while waiting for an extraction team... assuming one was on the way.
For a country to attack another country's embassy within their own borders is the diplomatic equivalent of a gang-rape. The Russian Foreign Ministry responded with a statement condemning the attack as an act of “terrorism” and asked the “international community” to respond to the attack and urged “all parties enjoying influence on extremists in Syria to demand they immediately stop such actions.”. Seems like only yesterday. We already tried the 'fly in billions in unmarked cash to say sorry' approach.
Tweet: 42 replies, 6176 views. Why don't we make it easier for people to vote? the Embassy is US Sovereign soil an attack on an embassy is an attack on america itself.. Obama will do no longer something, he's in campaign mode and the re-election is more beneficial major. This page was generated at 04:23 AM. I'm watching ZERO election coverage tonight. The timing of the shelling of the Russian embassy after these meetings cannot be merely coincidence coming right after them and coinciding with the Chinese-Russian naval drills in the Mediterranean and the attempt by the NATO pact to overthrow the government of Macedonia in order to disrupt the South Stream gas pipeline project.
And who is this mysterious “international community” they refer to? And let us not forget that German troops took part in the operations to illegally sever the Serbian province of Kosovo from the rest of Serbia, participated in the ethnic cleansing of Serbs from Kosovo and sat back and watched as countless Orthodox churches and cultural sites in the heart of Serbia were ruthlessly destroyed. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/25/w...ant-bombs.html, If this is your first visit, be sure to As for the marines defending an embassy. Carter didn't go into Iran in 1985 and Clinton bombed the Chinese Embassy in Serbia and got only harsh words. Ahh... remember when? There is no split between the Americans and their puppets.
The shelling of a foreign embassy by organised armed units engaged in a war is not an act of terrorism either. Regardless of the outcome, how can I prepare myself for Election Day tomorrow? They issued a statement condemning it but immediately turned around and excused the attack by accusing Russia of moving its forces into Ukraine. The Americans played the same game when the Russian embassy in Kiev was attacked on June 14, 2014 by a violent mob, including members of the Azov battalion and the Kiev foreign minister. Should Trump be arrested for negligent homicide? The views of the authors do not necessarily coincide with the opinion of the editorial board. But what is to be done about all this? The United States has remained silent so far on this bombing but we can expect the same hypocritical statement the State Department made regarding the attack on the Russian embassy in Damascus on November 28, 2013, and another attack in January of this year.
Let’s examine what an act of terrorism is. By international law, the host country is responsible for the safety and security of foreign embassies within its borders. 5 years ago?
They just said we had an election night like non-other. As President Obama was walking away after giving his statement on Libya, Fox Noise reporter Ed Henry yelled the question "Was this an act of war?" They do have certain rules of engagement. Well, everyone who is not blind, deaf and dumb knows it is the United States of America and its lieutenants in crime who are engaged in the war against Syria; Britain, France, Canada, Jordan, Turkey, Israel and Saudi Arabia. warfare is political action by different potential. Anyone trying to breach their perimeter would be in grave danger.
i put this in politics because of the ultimate political implications, so ypou all think that the Marines should just die happily and the politicians just make excuses. Second of all, it's on foreign soil.
apparently not because an american embassy was bombed under the carter administration and the clinton administration and neither did anything. It is an attack on civilians by individuals or small groups with the objective of creating terror in the population in order to achieve political purposes. It is a clear violation of the Vienna Convention. simple question...Do the marines defending the embassy have to abide with some code or rules of engagement or do they simply extract the diplomats and kill anyone getting in the way of doing that? The United States Faces Interesting Times, Russian S-400 Anti-aircraft Systems Turning Heads. It is an attack on the foreign state itself and therefore is an act of war … Hell yes. This guy I know always wears this scarf, why? Like the NATO attack on the Chinese embassy in its aggression against Yugoslavia in 1999, it is an act of war and is meant as a message to Russia to give up its support of Syria or suffer worse. At least. The meeting between President Putin and Mr. Kerry drew a lot of speculation that the Americans had recognised their “mistakes” in Ukraine, that they had realised their strategy had failed, and that there was a real division between the EU and their masters in Washington, all of which had brought the Americans to their senses. Equally brazen have been the recent 2011 attacks against the British embassy in Tehran and the Israeli embassy in Giza, Egypt—not to mention those in armed conflict situations in Syria, Afghanistan, and elsewhere. I hope people accept whoever wins the election without riots, what about you ? How well did ME war work out for us last time, Beav? It is US territory and they have a right to defend it, but they are in the middle of a foreign land, so the Ambassador has the final say. First of all, an embassy is just a silly office that doesn't accomplish anything. This is also the same woman who supported the putsch against President Yanukovich and who has continued to support the war crimes committed against the populations of east Ukraine by the Poroshenko junta in Kiev ever since.
I fear another 4 years of Trump. Only if the attack came from a government.